Abbiamo già avuto molte occasioni di accennare agli Irlandesi che si sono trapiantati in Inghilterra, e dobbiamo ora esaminare più da vicino le cause e gli effetti di questa immigrazione.
Il rapido sviluppo dell’ industria britannica non avrebbe potuto effettuarsi se nella povera e numerosa popolazione dell’Irlanda l’Inghilterra non avesse avuto una riserva di cui disporre.
L’Irlandese che a casa sua non aveva nulla da perdere, aveva invece molto da guadagnare in Inghilterra, e dal momento che in Irlanda si diffuse la notizia che ad oriente del Canale di San Giorgio, chi era provvisto di braccia robuste, aveva la possibilità di trovare un lavoro sicuro e un buon salario , cominciarono ad affluire ogni anno schiere di Irlandesi. Si calcola che a questo modo sia immigrato fino ad ora, più di un milione di persone e che ogni anno continuino ad affluirne cinquantamila circa, che si riversano quasi tutte nelle zone industriali e in particolarità nelle grandi città, dove costituiscono la classe più umile della popolazione
… questi operai irlandesi , che vengono trasportati in Inghilterra per 4 pence (3 grossi d’argento e 1/3) – sulla coperta del battello , dove stanno ammassati come bestiame- si annidano dovunque
Irish Immigration
We have already referred several times in passing to the Irish who have immigrated into England; and we shall now have to investigate more closely the causes and results of this immigration.
The rapid extension of English industry could not have taken place if England had not possessed in the numerous and impoverished population of Ireland a reserve at command. The Irish had nothing to lose at home, and much to gain in England; and from the time when it became known in Ireland that the east side of St. George’s Channel offered steady work and good pay for strong arms, every year has brought armies of the Irish hither. It has been calculated that more than a million have already immigrated, and not far from fifty thousand still come every year, nearly all of whom enter the industrial districts, especially the great cities, and there form the lowest class of the population. Thus there are in London, 120,000; in Manchester, 40,000; in Liverpool, 34,000; Bristol, 24,000; Glasgow, 40,000; Edinburgh, 29,000, poor Irish people. [4]These people having grown up almost. without civilisation, accustomed from youth to every sort of privation, rough, intemperate, and improvident, bring all their brutal habits with them among a class of the English population which has, in truth, little inducement to cultivate education and morality. Let us hear Thomas Carlyle upon this subject: [5]
“The wild Milesian [6] features, looking false ingenuity, restlessness, unreason, misery, and mockery, salute you on all highways and byways. The English coachman, as he whirls past, lashes the Milesian with his whip, curses him with his tongue; the Milesian is holding out his hat to beg. He is the sorest evil this country has to strive with. In his rags and laughing savagery, he is there to undertake all work that can be done by mere strength of hand and back — for wages that will purchase him potatoes. He needs only salt for condiment, he lodges to his mind in any pig-hutch or dog-hutch, roosts in outhouses, and wears a suit of tatters, the getting on and off of which is said to be a difficult operation, transacted only in festivals and the high tides of the calendar. The Saxon-man, if he cannot work on these terms, finds no work. The uncivilised Irishman, not by his strength, but by the opposite of strength, drives the Saxon native out, takes possession in his room. There abides he, in his squalor and unreason, in his falsity and drunken violence, as the ready-made nucleus of degradation and disorder. Whoever struggles, swimming with difficulty, may now find an example how the human being can exist not swimming, but sunk…. That the condition of the lower multitude of English labourers approximates more and more to that of the Irish, competing with them in all the markets: that whatsoever labour, to which mere strength with little skill will suffice, is to be done, will be done not at the English price, but at an approximation to the Irish price; at a price superior as yet to the Irish, that is, superior to scarcity of potatoes for thirty weeks yearly; superior, yet hourly, with the arrival of every new steamboat, sinking nearer to an equality with that.”
If we except his exaggerated and one-sided condemnation of the Irish national character, Carlyle is perfectly right. These Irishmen who migrate for fourpence to England, on the deck of a steamship on which they are often packed like cattle, insinuate themselves everywhere. The worst dwellings are good enough for them; their clothing causes them little trouble, so long as it holds together by a single thread; shoes they know not; their food consists of potatoes and potatoes only; whatever they earn beyond these needs they spend upon drink. What does such a race want with high wages? The worst quarters of all the large towns are inhabited by Irishmen. Whenever a district is distinguished for especial filth and especial ruinousness, the explorer may safely count upon meeting chiefly those Celtic faces which one recognises at the first glance as different from the Saxon physiognomy of the native, and the singing, aspirate brogue which the true Irishman never loses. I have occasionally heard the Irish-Celtic language spoken in the most thickly populated parts of Manchester. The majority of the families who live in cellars are almost everywhere of Irish origin. In short, the Irish have, as Dr. Kay says, discovered the minimum of the necessities of life, and are now making the English workers acquainted with it. Filth and drunkenness, too, they have brought with them. The lack of cleanliness, which is not so injurious in the country, where population is scattered, and which is the Irishman’s second nature, becomes terrifying and gravely dangerous through its concentration here in the great cities. The Milesian deposits all garbage and filth before his house door here, as he was accustomed to do at home, and so accumulates the pools and dirt-heaps which disfigure the working- people’s quarters and poison the air. He builds a pig-sty against the house wall as he did at home, and if he is prevented from doing this, he lets the pig sleep in the room with himself. This new and unnatural method of cattle-raising in cities is wholly of Irish origin. The Irishman loves his pig as the Arab his horse, with the difference that he sells it when it is fat enough to kill. Otherwise, he eats and sleeps with it, his children play with it, ride upon it, roll in the dirt with it, as any one may see a thousand times repeated in all the great towns of England. The filth and comfortlessness that prevail in the houses themselves it is impossible to describe. The Irishman is unaccustomed to the presence of furniture; a heap of straw, a few rags, utterly beyond use as clothing, suffice for his nightly couch. A piece of wood, a broken chair, an old chest for a table, more he needs not; a tea-kettle, a few pots and dishes, equip his kitchen, which is also his sleeping and living room. When he is in want of fuel, everything combustible within his reach, chairs, door-posts, mouldings, flooring, finds its way up the chimney. Moreover, why should he need much room? At home in his mud-cabin there was only one room for all domestic purposes; more than one room his family does not need in England. So the custom of crowding many persons into a single room, now so universal, has been chiefly implanted by the Irish immigration. And since the poor devil must have one enjoyment, and society has shut him out of all others, he betakes himself to the drinking of spirits. Drink is the only thing which makes the Irishman’s life worth having, drink and his cheery care-free temperament; so he revels in drink to the point of the most bestial drunkenness. The southern facile character of the Irishman, his crudity, which places him but little above the savage, his contempt for all humane enjoyments, in which his very crudeness makes him incapable of sharing, his filth and poverty, all favour drunkenness. The temptation is great, he cannot resist it, and so when he has money he gets rid of it down his throat. What else should he do? How can society blame him when it places him in a position in which he almost of necessity becomes a drunkard; when it leaves him to himself, to his savagery?
With such a competitor the English working-man has to struggle, with a competitor upon the lowest plane possible in a civilised country, who for this very reason requires less wages than any other. Nothing else is therefore possible than that, as Carlyle says, the wages of English working-man should be forced down further and further in every branch in which the Irish compete with him. And these branches are many. All such as demand little or no skill are open to the Irish. For work which requires long training or regular, pertinacious application, the dissolute, unsteady, drunken Irishman is on too low a plane. To become a mechanic, a mill-hand, he would have to adopt the English civilisation, the English customs, become, in the main, an Englishman. But for all simple, less exact work, wherever it is a question more of strength than skill, the Irishman is as good as the Englishman. Such occupations are therefore especially overcrowded with Irishmen: hand-weavers, bricklayers, porters, jobbers, and such workers, count hordes of Irishmen among their number, and the pressure of this race has done much to depress wages and lower the working-class. And even if the Irish, who have forced their way into other occupations, should become more civilised, enough of the old habits would cling to them to have a strong, degrading influence upon their English companions in toil, especially in view of the general effect of being surrounded by the Irish. For when, in almost every great city, a fifth or a quarter of the workers are Irish, or children of Irish parents, who have grown up among Irish filth, no one can wonder if the life, habits, intelligence, moral status — in short, the whole character of the working-class assimilates a great part of the Irish characteristics. On the contrary, it is easy to understand how the degrading position of the English workers, engendered by our modern history, and its immediate consequences, has been still more degraded by the presence of Irish competition.
Engels Friedrich – La situazione della classe operaia in Inghilterra …
Engels on ‘social murder’ | controappuntoblog.org
L’ennesima tragedia in mare
Solo il superamento del capitalismo può mettere fine alle sue barbarie
Prima o poi doveva accadere di nuovo ed è accaduto. La strage nel mare di Lampedusa non è una tragica fatalità, ma la logica conseguenza delle politiche messe in atto dalla borghesia per fermare il flusso di profughi o “semplici” migranti in cerca di lavoro, che fuggono dalle guerre civili e dalla miseria, che ha come prima conseguenza quella di rendere gli immigrati una merce a basso costo. Una forza lavoro più docile, perché più ricattabile, da cui estorcere senza freni o quasi plusvalore, unica ragione di vita del capitalismo. Questa è la sostanza delle leggi sull’immigrazione varate da governi di ogni colore che, con durezza crescente, hanno sprangato le porte d’ingresso ufficiali all’Europa, solo per consegnare le vite di migliaia e migliaia di persone nelle mani dei trafficanti di esserei umani, di organi di ricambio per la ricca borghessia prima, nei campi di concentramento, poi, istituiti da chi adesso ostenta in televisione sdegno e pietà. Il CPT, il CIE, la burocrazia spietata e incombente come una spada di Damocle ricordano all’immigrato che la sua esistenza è legata all’accettazione passiva dello sfruttamento, anche in condizioni schiavistiche come nei campi di pomodori nel sud d’Italia o nascosti nei recessi di qualche fabbrica di manufatti al nord.
Il cinismo ripugnante di cui è capace la borghesia non ci stupisce: il capitalismo è nato e vive tra fango e sangue, dolore e pianto, e ha sempre mascherato la brutale violenza di cui è fatto, dando fondo all’ipocrisia più spudorata. Dalla “culla della democrazia” (USA) alla “culla dei diritti umani” (Beccaria, Italia) si contano a decine di migliaia le donne e gli uomini morti nei deserti dell’Arizona o del New Mexico, nelle acque del Mediterraneo. “Gente” che fugge da catastrofi ambientali accelerate o prodotte dai “mercati”, dalle guerre, dalla povertà, dalla fame, figlie altrettanto legittime di quei “mercati”, cioè del profitto.
La crisi, vale a dire la difficoltà di realizzare profitti adeguati alla composizione del capitale odierna, è alla radice delle politiche migratorie attuate dalle borghesie di ogni continente, un altro tassello fondamentale della guerra condotta contro il proletariato, contro i diseredati del pianeta. La strage ha dunque un mandante, il capitalismo, e un esecutore, la borghesia, da quella che siede nei parlamenti a quella che specula con le carrette del mare. Se non si capisce questo e non se ne traggono le necessarie conclusioni, la rabbia, il dolore per i morti ammazzati di Lampedusa rimangono sentimenti, nobili, certo, ma sterili.
Dobbiamo opporre alla barbarie del capitalismo l’unità del proletariato indigeno, migrante ,dei bianche e dei neri. L’internazionalismo proletario non ha colore.
Venerdì, October 4, 2013
http://www.leftcom.org/it/articles/2013-10-04/l-ennesima-tragedia-in-mare